Since my last post dealt with high school, I felt the need to take another trip down memory lane. this time I wanted to go back to a conversation with a friend I had in class. I’m pretty foggy about the details but it dealt with a book that she read that described all of the archetypical male roles that women fall for and why they do.
Here are the ones I remember:
The “G” : The gangsta/ bad boy type. Their tough exterior probably provides the sense of security to women.
The Sweet talker: These guys have the best “game.” They know how to talk to women in a way that boost their self-esteem or at least arouse them.
The workaholic: The financial provider. Their drive to be successful and financially stable is never a bad thing.
Mr. Sensitive: Everybody’s favorite go to guy when times get tough. You can always come to him when you need that emotional support.
There may be more but I’ve long since forgotten. I do remember this though each of these types of men lack something. It is only by combining the good qualities of each trait does a man become the total package or as my friend likes to say “The Renaissance Man.” Strong like the “G,” mentally sexy like the Sweet talker, a provider like the workaholic, and supportive like the sensitive man. As nice as it may be to be considered the “Total Package,” it probably isn’t gonna happen for me, but still it is good to have something to aspire to.
If anybody out there in the interweb has any idea what book my friend could have been talking about leave me a comment, or at least wish me luck in becoming the fabled Renaissance Man.